2 ms·
Sure - but that is "terrific" in the still-current sense of "massive, of great size" - not the archaic use in the parent.
by mellosouls 6y ago
Sure - but that is "terrific" in the still-current sense of "massive, of great size" - not the archaic use in the parent.
- pfranz 6y agoThe only reason I remember that use is because it sounded out of place to me. This posting [1] puts the usage change from around 1880-1930. I've always taken the modern usage to mean unusually fine/magnificent. [1] https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38606/what-gave-terrific-a-positive-connotation https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38606/what-gave-...