It seems like this whole thing could be solved by renaming the tag from "Personal Edition" to "Lite Edition" or something. People want to use and "office" produ

It seems like this whole thing could be solved by renaming the tag from "Personal Edition" to "Lite Edition" or something. People want to use and "office" product for work, duh. The document foundation keep arguing that funding is needed and the users keep arguing that they want a free version for commercial use and that naming is important because "the boss won't read the license agreement but look at the name! Personal Edition" Why are people on the defensive always so blinded by the obvious? If you understand what people are getting upset about then, on the first line of the letter, they should state, unambiguously, exactly what people are having an issue with. Instead, the introduction is about the success of LibraOffice which is not contended and actually somewhat irrelevant. Then this: > So it is a bit surprising to see the project's core developers in a sort of crisis mode while users worry about a tag that showed up in the project's repository This sentence just tells the reader that you still don't understand what the fuss is about because you are referring to past good will and not the simple fact that the name is wrong. Readers want to know that you understand their point of view before they are willing to read about your point of view.