4 ms·
But it is something like a person selling both weed and meth next to each other, without any communication or acknowledgement that one is significantly more lik
by richthegeek 6y ago
But it is something like a person selling both weed and meth next to each other, without any communication or acknowledgement that one is significantly more likely to cause harm.
- vladvasiliu 6y agoMaybe. I propose that it's a question of context. If pot were legal, maybe people would be happy to get high on that at stop there. I think there are two issues at play, both going in the same direction. 1. If buying pot is going to carry the same risk as buying meth, and I can get higher for the same quantity of meth (I assume meth is more potent per unit of volume) it would make some sense for me to try to get meth, or at the very least to be interested when someone offers, especially if I'm not 100% sure when I'll be able to buy more pot. 2. There is also a question of trust. If the government says pot is as bad as meth (both schedule 1, I hear about big police operations taking down pot dealers, etc) they I might believe them. After all, what do I know? I just want to get high. So when I get to try some pot, see that I like it, see many people smoking pot without much harm, I figure I might as well try some meth. Especially given point 1 above.