3 ms·
<redacted> Obviously, the OP was talking about the perception of Germany today and I think we can safely assume that no Ex-Nazi personnel is currently working
by kleiba 6y ago
<redacted>
Obviously, the OP was talking about the perception of Germany today and I think we can safely assume that no Ex-Nazi personnel is currently working at the German secret service. And coming to think of it, why wouldn't someone whose qualified to spy on others be rehired to do the same job in Germany after the end of GDR? What do you think secret services do?
Regarding "environmentally friendly", this point is correct but you're omitting that Germany just recently passed a law to get out of coal until 2038. The energy produced in Germany will then be pretty much exclusively renewable which is not a small feat for a country with such a large population.
- durnygbur 6y ago> Hilarious and schizoid are adjectives that I would assign to your post. Sorry but you are rude. > I think we can safely assume that no Ex-Nazi personnel is currently working at the German secret service Stasi personel though? Are you expecting that people using such nuanced and subtle techniques like Zersetzung against domestic population [1] will suddently become ethical towards anyone they perceive as threat? or as undesirable? On the facade Germans get some show off initiatives (no Street View!), behind the scenes is business as usual. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung
- kleiba 6y ago> Sorry but you are rude. Yes, you are right. I apologize, I clearly went overboard. > Stasi personel though? [...] I think it's just an over-generalization. Just because you worked for the Stasi automatically makes you a bad fit for a certain job. It really depends.
- levleontiev 6y ago>Just because you worked for the Stasi automatically makes you a bad fit for a certain job. I am sorry, I am from Russia initially, the KGB-land. No, it's not an over-generalization.