3 ms·
You're missing the point - it's about proving dedication. Building a prototype, no matter how crappy, tells potential tech cofounders that you're less likely t
by coolgeek 16y ago
You're missing the point - it's about proving dedication. Building a prototype, no matter how crappy, tells potential tech cofounders that you're less likely to bail when you see something shinier.
That said, raising money (or investing your own) would indeed serve the same purpose.
- trustfundbaby 16y agoActually I think you're missing the point. What I was responding to was this -----> If the non-tech founder can't even learn enough code to get anything built then I would be concerned for their level of dedication for their own idea Just because a guy doesn't go to learn how to code doesn't mean you should immediately get worried about their dedication to their project. I see the point you're trying to make, and I agree with it, but it quite different from what I was addressing.