3 ms·
I spent some time digging into the London story. Here's some facts: Spending levels are much higher than parent reported. [1] for one school chosen at random
by brandmeyer 6y ago
I spent some time digging into the London story. Here's some facts:
Spending levels are much higher than parent reported. [1] for one school chosen at random shows that their budget was almost 8000 GBP/pupil - over 30% higher than cited. Furthermore, 82% was staffing. A mere 3% is allocated to facilities.
In my local school district[2], salaries for all staff add up to a little less than 60% of the budget. Facilities (21.6%) and debt service (7.6%) are a far greater fraction of our costs.
In short, the "education is cheaper in London" story is a lie. Many of their costs are payed for by a different color of money entirely, and simply doesn't show up on the education budget.
[1] https://schools-financial-benchmarking.service.gov.uk/school/detail?urn=134693# https://schools-financial-benchmarking.service.gov.uk/school...
[2] https://www.adams12.org/financial-services/documents/fiscal-year-2019-2020-adopted-budget https://www.adams12.org/financial-services/documents/fiscal-...
- rayiner 6y agoThe school you picked “at random” is a community academy, which is a special kind of charter school outside the regular school system, which may also receive outside funding. So that doesn’t contradict the numbers I posted, which are for regular public schools in London. Here is another chart that’s consistent with my numbers: https://dfemedia.blog.gov.uk/2019/10/11/school-funding-allocations-2020-21/ https://dfemedia.blog.gov.uk/2019/10/11/school-funding-alloc...