3 ms·

This wasn't flame bait. It was just an observation. Please realize that it was other people who decided to flame. Just because someone decides to have a bad att

This wasn't flame bait. It was just an observation. Please realize that it was other people who decided to flame. Just because someone decides to have a bad attitude doesn't make my post flame bait. I made a general observation about corruption and culture, other people decided to respond to it in a bad way. If this type of comment isn't allowed on HN it's a form of censorship. Basically I can't say anything negative about a culture or a country because it's classified as flame bait. This is similar to the way the CCP practices censorship in China. People in my country basically can't say anything negative about it. Thank you for perpetuating that sentiment here on HN.

dang 6y ago
"It says a lot about the general attitude of Chinese people" in the context of a story about fraud is obvious flamebait. Please follow the site guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html You can call moderation 'censorship'—people mostly just mean by it that they don't like something. I don't see the similarity to the communist party myself, but have been accused of communism so often by now—invariably after doing a bit of standard moderation that somebody disliked—that it has all come to seem more internet-silly than anything anybody actually believes.
- leafboi 6y ago
  >"It says a lot about the general attitude of Chinese people" in the context of a story about fraud is obvious flamebait. The context is fraud in China. The context involves multiple people from all walks of life and society in China contributing to the fraud. A stark contrast to how corruption occurs in the states. I don't think it's obvious flamebait at all. The definition of what is flamebait itself is rather vague.. A good way to definitively define flamebait is to call it any comment which starts a flamewar. This means a definitive classification of flamebait can only be crystallized after the posting of the comment in question and observing the resulting aftermath... In this case I see no flamewar, so I don't believe my comment constitutes as such.

dang 6y ago

"It says a lot about the general attitude of Chinese people" in the context of a story about fraud is obvious flamebait. Please follow the site guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html You can call moderation 'censorship'—people mostly just mean by it that they don't like something. I don't see the similarity to the communist party myself, but have been accused of communism so often by now—invariably after doing a bit of standard moderation that somebody disliked—that it has all come to seem more internet-silly than anything anybody actually believes.

leafboi 6y ago
>"It says a lot about the general attitude of Chinese people" in the context of a story about fraud is obvious flamebait. The context is fraud in China. The context involves multiple people from all walks of life and society in China contributing to the fraud. A stark contrast to how corruption occurs in the states. I don't think it's obvious flamebait at all. The definition of what is flamebait itself is rather vague.. A good way to definitively define flamebait is to call it any comment which starts a flamewar. This means a definitive classification of flamebait can only be crystallized after the posting of the comment in question and observing the resulting aftermath... In this case I see no flamewar, so I don't believe my comment constitutes as such.