>the writer makes obvious their biases with statements like Your refutations of the writers points on the surface level is still too charitable. The New Yorke

>the writer makes obvious their biases with statements like Your refutations of the writers points on the surface level is still too charitable. The New Yorker writer knows very damn well that Metz could have just been lying to Scott about the real name "policy" and lying about the purpose of the piece in an effort to make Alexander cooperative.