This is kind of the same point I was making. I'm not trying to prove that anything was just or not in some grand scheme of things. I'm arguing that "what happe

This is kind of the same point I was making. I'm not trying to prove that anything was just or not in some grand scheme of things. I'm arguing that "what happens after war" is not some fixed law of nature, but a human decision. Human decisions are not laws of nature, they can be changed. Historical precedent can be a useful tool, but it's not the same as "something immutable we must adhere to".