3 ms·
For non-natives not really. For natives, it depends on the agreements. This isn't really a traditional reservation situation, since the tribes really are not
by protomyth 6y ago
For non-natives not really. For natives, it depends on the agreements. This isn't really a traditional reservation situation, since the tribes really are not going to have the traditional governance over the land. For example, the cops are not going to get replaced by BIA or Tribal police.
- koheripbal 6y agoWhy not? If they're on tribal land, what's to stop the tribe from governing?
- protomyth 6y agoThere are other places that are technically on tribal land, and that hasn't allowed the tribe to government them. The city and state is not going to cede governance on non-members to the tribe. Its going to end up being an agreement between the state and the tribe.
- skissane 6y agoTribal governments only have criminal jurisdiction over crimes committed by Native Americans (an enrolled member of the tribe, or an enrolled member of some other federally recognised tribe). If the perpetrator is not Native American, the tribal government and courts cannot deal with the case, only local/state/federal courts and authorities can. (There is an exception to this rule, created by Congress, that domestic violence crimes committed by a non-native against their Native American spouse or partner can be dealt with through the tribal legal system.) Civil legal jurisdiction over non-native individuals is somewhat broader, but still subject to various complex legal limits. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43324.pdf https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43324.pdf
- koheripbal 6y agoNo, the big issue is the collection of taxes.