4 ms·
I would say it more precisely translates to "are supposed to". Although it is clear from the actual content of the article that it would not really be a choice.
by this_user 6y ago
I would say it more precisely translates to "are supposed to". Although it is clear from the actual content of the article that it would not really be a choice.
- qwertox 6y agoNo, "are supposed to" is less strict than "must". If the law passes, then they must allow the intelligence services to do this. Or "will have to" if they want to continue to be in the business.