I’m aware - I read the article shortly after it went up. In a narrow reading of the article, I think this critique tracks. However, given the broader prominenc

I’m aware - I read the article shortly after it went up. In a narrow reading of the article, I think this critique tracks. However, given the broader prominence of that particular digital debate and Lorenz’ unique success in centering the discussion online to this purported “SV war on media”, their Twitter situation exists as the girder for the broader arguments in the article.