This article could've been a lot worse, but it still suffers from the mistake that the press is axiomatically good and anyone voicing upset at it must be evil a

This article could've been a lot worse, but it still suffers from the mistake that the press is axiomatically good and anyone voicing upset at it must be evil and/or have something to hide. If you take that as a baseline assumption, instead of an empirical hypothesis that is looking increasingly shaky, then you're going to end up with an article like this one where the tone clearly conveys who you're supposed to sympathize with in a way that is not supported by the facts.