>If desktop Linux is ever going to be mainstream Who says it needs to be? What if what appeals to Linux desktop users is precisely what differentiates it from

>If desktop Linux is ever going to be mainstream Who says it needs to be? What if what appeals to Linux desktop users is precisely what differentiates it from the mainstream? Snap is regressive. What we have now works better, faster, lighter, and more secure. No, you can't have a convenient means of shipping your proprietary electron 10G garbage monster to end users. We don't need it to be "mainstream".