> They're attempting to paint this advice as coming from experts- but without attaching names You mean these names? They're linked in the article. https://aca

> They're attempting to paint this advice as coming from experts- but without attaching names You mean these names? They're linked in the article. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa939/5867798 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa939... They're credible enough and this action public enough that the WHO got the message: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/health/coronavirus-aerosols-who.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/health/coronavirus-aeroso.... > we're relying solely on the credibility of the author from the NYT. Given the incentive structure of being an internet blogger (sensationalism = $$$$), that credibility is very limited. The NYT isn't a blog.