> This doesnt mean international students should be forced to leave the country if they are not taking an in-person class, for example. But I don't think it mea

> This doesnt mean international students should be forced to leave the country if they are not taking an in-person class, for example. But I don't think it means universities should be prevented from allowing in-person classes if they take precautions and understand the risk. ? Nobody is being prevented from holding in-person classes if they want to. And yes, international students being forced to leave the country is what we're talking about. This rule has nothing to do with risk/reward balance or picking which classes benefit most from in-person interaction. The driving analogy would make sense if students were being forced to drive one hour a week without a seatbelt for no reason in order to remain in the country.