The CM article doesn't answer your questions at all and instead for some reason digs around in the public accounts of this company. Why? The FT article goes in

The CM article doesn't answer your questions at all and instead for some reason digs around in the public accounts of this company. Why? The FT article goes into much more detail about the actual procurement process and the surroundings issues. > ”Around 16,000 potential suppliers contacted a 500-person buying team set up by the Cabinet Office in March to offer to supply kit for hospital staff." This is because one of them is actual journalism and one of them is a biased write-up of pointless open source research.