3 ms·
> But we can ignore the numbers and just see the bodies did not pile up in Sweden streets. From this I can not say with certainty any more that quarantine was w
by doublesCs 6y ago
> But we can ignore the numbers and just see the bodies did not pile up in Sweden streets. From this I can not say with certainty any more that quarantine was worth it considering it does not come without serious downsides.
I agree with you that naive comparison of numbers is difficult. That said, Yes, you've just showed what's problematic in ignoring the numbers and focusing only on what is evident. If your mind can only comprehend either "all hunky dorey" or "bodies piling up on the street", then I indeed Sweden is closer to the former. Bodies would never be piling up on the street in any concievable scenario with this virus, as this virus has a case fatality rate of about 0.1% average for the population and our society's infrastructure can easily handle 0.1% of its population bodies spread over a period of years. I hoped that the people in charge could be a bit more sophisticated, but apparently that's not the case in many countries (e.g. Sweden, UK)
- trabant00 6y agoManner of speaking with the bodies in the street. I mean it is not signifincantly worse.
- doublesCs 6y agoAgain, I think you're not really looking at the numbers. You're just going "the world didn't end, lets move on". I would say it's very significantly different from countries that did it well. Deaths per 1M for similar size countries in europe: Belgium - 844 [1] Sweden - 543 Netherlands - 358 Ireland - 352 Switzerland - 227 Portugal - 160 Denmark - 105 Romania - 94 Austria - 78 Hungary - 61 [1] https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-belgium-coronavirus-covid19-pandemic-response/ https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-belgium-corona... If you still think Sweden did a good job, I'm not sure I can help you any more.