3 ms·
WASM isn't "more ambitious". It is a spec for portable bytecode, nothing more, nothing less. LLVM is one of the best toolchains for many languages. They are c
by jfkebwjsbx 6y ago
WASM isn't "more ambitious". It is a spec for portable bytecode, nothing more, nothing less.
LLVM is one of the best toolchains for many languages.
They are completely different things.
- harikb 6y agoYes, I agree. Wording wasn't right. What I meant was that it is trying to define a universal target with runtime system interface and such. The only reason I drew a comparison was that both are trying to bring standardization, but in different contexts.