4 ms·
My limited understanding is that the genomics community thinks the authors are full of it. Given that the lead author is Ioannidis, I'm sure that's the case.
by AbrahamParangi 6y ago
My limited understanding is that the genomics community thinks the authors are full of it. Given that the lead author is Ioannidis, I'm sure that's the case.
- lsiebert 6y agoNature is peer reviewed right? Who in the genomics community is saying that this is BS?
- redis_mlc 6y agoPeer review just means some people read the paper, not that anything was replicated. Peer review: the meth for educated people.
- bitsofpancake 6y agoNo comment about the paper itself, but note that the first author is Alexander Ioannidis, not the John Ioannidis of Covid infamy.
- throwqqq 6y agoThis is nature. The most prestigious scientific publication. The study was peer reviewed by people who do know what they are talking about. Not everything is a blog.
- tomcam 6y agoYour sole contribution to this discourse is to bad talk someone while providing absolutely no evidence? I have no dog in this fight. I have no idea how solid the article is. But that’s why I’m not trashing it.
- beowulfey 6y agoTotally different person. Same last name. Probably not related.
- aaron695 6y agoAnthropologists just make shit up, because it's how you get published and it's hard to disprove and truth be told people like stories real or not. These DNA tests are mathematically provable so it's much harder to make stuff up, this shouldn't be so much in the fakeish sciences like biology or worse, this should be more bounded. Where have you read this?