2 ms·
I was meaning stronger relationships, as in ones that are more likely to get to "let's have kids". But I'll meet you at your point, is stability in a relationsh
by kennywinker 6y ago
I was meaning stronger relationships, as in ones that are more likely to get to "let's have kids". But I'll meet you at your point, is stability in a relationship a bad strategy?
My answers would be:
1. it's debatable
2. there are multiple viable strategies
3. any theory about what increases fitness needs testing and ones like this are very hard to prove or disprove since the signals are noisy.
> A male in unstable relationships can have far more offspring than a man in stable relationship
Theoretically can have, sure. But that doesn't instantly translate to that being a higher fitness strategy. For example - does that strategy work in practice, or only in theory? And if it does, what is the success of those offspring? An individual's reproductive success is only as good as their offspring's reproductive success. It's quite possible kids from stable homes are more likely to have more kids than those from unstable homes for a million subtle reasons.