Yeah and Steve Jobs owned even less of Apple. There's a difference between ownership and leadership. Twitter would be a very different place without Jack. It wo

Yeah and Steve Jobs owned even less of Apple. There's a difference between ownership and leadership. Twitter would be a very different place without Jack. It would turn into Facebook or TikTok. Twitter is like a BDFL hobby project. I obviously don't mean that literally and am aware it's a publicly traded corporation. Twitter is a hobby project in the way that Oculus is a hobby project of Zuckerberg, even though Zuckerberg is the biggest shareholder of Facebook. It's a matter of where the leader made his money--Zuckerberg made his money from selling ads on FB (not VR), Jack made his money from selling a financial product (not social media).