3 ms·
Continuing Ubuntu One was not sustainable: https://ubuntu.com/blog/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-file-services https://ubuntu.com/blog/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-file-
by xet7 6y ago
Continuing Ubuntu One was not sustainable:
https://ubuntu.com/blog/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-file-services https://ubuntu.com/blog/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-file-servic...
Ubuntu One file syncing, also server part, has been Open Sourced with much effort from Canonical:
https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-one-file-syncing-code-open-sourced https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-one-file-syncing-code-open-so...
Ubuntu Touch https://ubports.com https://ubports.com is run by community and has rapid progress, it's running on PinePhone etc.
Canonical would have liked to continue Unity:
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/10/why-did-ubuntu-drop-unity-mark-shuttleworth-explains https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/10/why-did-ubuntu-drop-unit...
I would presume Upstart Init system was changed to systemd because other distros started using systemd.
I don't see a trend here.
- afiori 6y agoYou have described a trend where those technologies failed to gain sustainable traction and Canonical stopped investing in them. Whether they did this because they are evil or unlucky is not the point.