6 ms·
Makes sense that when you're interviewing programmers you don't have to look for candidates proficient in your particular area. You need someone willing to lear
by ZainRiz 6y ago
Makes sense that when you're interviewing programmers you don't have to look for candidates proficient in your particular area. You need someone willing to learn
Conversely, if you're interviewing, signaling that you are highly interested in learning turns you into a strong candidate.
I learned this one by accident when I interviewed at a company I didn't care about
Relevant excerpt from a blog post I wrote [1]:
> I was wandering around the booths with my bag full of swag. My eyes caught a pile of rubik’s cubes being given away by some company I’d never heard of. I wanted one! Of course I couldn’t just go up and ask for it directly, so I went and chatted with the guy manning the booth. His name was Vince. A few minutes later I walked away with my prized rubik’s cube in hand. That evening Vince called me up offering to conduct a full interview loop on campus. I already had a job offer from a company I liked, but I thought “Sure, why not? I could use the experience”
> I had no intention of joining the company, they were some boring finance business. There was nothing to lose. So during the interview I felt free to ask any question I wanted. When I thought I got the answer to an interview question wrong, I’d ask “I don’t think I did so great here. What’s the right answer to this problem?” (I wanted to learn the answer for future interviews!). When asked a challenging question I could grin and delight in the problem solving aspect instead of worrying about how badly it would reflect on me. (Remember my smart aleck remark in the intro? That was this interview.)
> Turns out they liked that: the next day I had a second job offer. At a significantly higher salary than my first one. Oh, and they wanted to fly me to New York in two weeks for an introduction to the company. I still didn’t want to join, but a free trip to New York? Sign me up! The company’s name: Bloomberg
> Bloomberg was a practiced hand at recruiting. They had a full two days of events to leave us starry eyed about the company (I came thiiiiis close to accepting their offer). While there, Vince told me I’d made a great impression by fearlessly asking questions, even when I was stumped.
> Since then I’ve stopped hesitating before asking any question in an interview. Let your curiosity run free! Don’t cage it! And as an interviewer, I can attest: sincere interest is always a good sign.
[1] https://zainrizvi.io/blog/the-interview-advice-no-one-gives-you/ https://zainrizvi.io/blog/the-interview-advice-no-one-gives-...
- pertymcpert 6y agoI completely agree that that's the best way to do an interview, without pressure and treating it as an intellectual exercise with some fun. Unfortunately FANGs (well at least FB) have a tendency to mark you down mentally when you show any weakness. To them you're up against 10 other candidates who got to the right answer not only correctly, but fast.
- Google234 6y agoThey have to use some fair method to choose between those 10 people...
- mnd999 6y agoGetting to the right answer fast is only relevant if they asked the right questions. I think the point of the article is that interviewers are not asking the right questions.
- ZainRiz 6y agoWhile maybe that's true at FB (it's not true at Google), your brain flips a special bit if you convince yourself that there's no time crunch. There've been various studies done which show that individuals who are under pressure to perform any creative work actually have worse output in the same amount of time compared to people who're doing that exact same creative work for fun I think there's a famous study about people being asked to attach a candle to a wall with a box of nails that's the most well known example of this phenomenon. So even if what you say is true, it's in your best interest to forget that fact and focus on the fun
- saghm 6y agoThis is almost completely unrelated, but what was the quality of the cube? None of the cubes I ever got from swag booths ever were very usable; I think they were optimized more for visual appeal than ease of turning the side, in addition to likely being cheaply made. It's totally understandable, but on the other hand, a company that gave a cube that wasn't such a pain to use would have gotten some free marketing from me using it.