4 ms·
Yeah, and I checked a few whois history sites and the domain had been registered with Mark Monitor as the registrar. That's a major mistake on their [MarkMonito
by devrand 6y ago
Yeah, and I checked a few whois history sites and the domain had been registered with Mark Monitor as the registrar. That's a major mistake on their [MarkMonitor's] part.
Edit: clarified that I meant the error seems to be on MM's side.
- neonate 6y agoWhat's the major mistake? I don't follow.
- nertzy 6y agoI read it as that blogspot.in was registered via Mark Monitor and that MM made a big mistake here.
- devrand 6y agoCompanies hire MarkMonitor to safeguard their protected marks, which generally involves registering these marks under basically every TLD available. MarkMonitor themselves is an ICANN registrar so companies generally don't need to worry about renewals: MarkMonitor just handles it (how it actually gets billed back likely depends upon the contract). So unless Google explicitly told MarkMonitor to release the domain, this seems like MarkMonitor dropped the ball.
- kyrra 6y agoGoogle doesn't use MarkMonitor as far as I know.
- bergstromm466 6y agoI think you misunderstood, MM is a company that could have prevented this.
- devrand 6y agoThe domain was registered with MM.
- bergstromm466 6y agoOh shit! Then it was me who misunderstood. Thanks!