I suspect this is intentional. What is contained in the article doesn't age out. As a counter-point, the best article on salary negotiation _ever written_ [0]

I suspect this is intentional. What is contained in the article doesn't age out. As a counter-point, the best article on salary negotiation _ever written_ [0] has the timestamp in the URL, which undoubtedly dissuades people from reading, given that it was written eight years ago. If a potential reader avoids the article because of it's age, they're poorer for it. IMO the author is doing the world a favor by not time-stamping the article. [0] https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/ https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/