3 ms·
You're just reiterating the cynical mindset that I'm recommending against, because it's: a) Atrophic to one's career b) Just a generally miserable way to live
by _bxg1 6y ago
You're just reiterating the cynical mindset that I'm recommending against, because it's:
a) Atrophic to one's career
b) Just a generally miserable way to live as a programmer
I don't believe things are so bleak, and I think people would benefit from being open to that possibility.
- pjmlp 6y agoI do enterprise consulting, if it generates new business opportunities I am all ears, regardless my cynical view.
- acituan 6y ago> a) Atrophic to one's career Career growth after entry level rarely hinges on acquisition of technical knowledge. If anything, technical knowledge is the easiest to acquire which is why entry levels can claim it without much work experience. Organizational navigation, team work, delivering actual results, knowing how and when to apply those skills (and when not to) mostly come with experience, and those are going to be the determining factors for promotions beyond entry levels. > b) Just a generally miserable way to live as a programmer I would argue it is more miserable to not have developed those tacit skills so that keeping up with the latest and greatest is the only element of competitive advantage to stay relevant. I would also speculate this might be the reason why juniors tend to over-emphasize the latest tech as the greatest tech, because they don't think they have anything else to be competitive in the job market. Curiosity is not an algorithmic virtue, it doesn't apply to every case. It needs to be tempered with a dose of conservatism to deliver results in real world.