3 ms·

I'm not sure when you looked at Bitwarden but the official server and clients are open source under the AGPL, including the API for other people to make their o

I'm not sure when you looked at Bitwarden but the official server and clients are open source under the AGPL, including the API for other people to make their own servers and clients with. So I would say that Bitwarden fills the FOSS all the way requirement. https://github.com/bitwarden https://github.com/bitwarden

LanternLight83 6y ago
I've self hosted the rust server, and have attempted to host the official server but found that it was difficult to install and addly slow once configured. Running your own server also loses you many of the benefits of premium if you keep supporting the project. They changed their color scheme from my favorite blue to Facebook-blue, and after exploring it on tails, I think I'll be more than happy to transition to keepass in the future.
- commoner 6y ago
  The bitwarden_rs server features TOTP entries and support for login with U2F (YubiKey) and Duo. It also handles Vault attachments and organizations. Which premium features are you missing?
  - cies 6y ago
    bitwarden_rs is really nice code.
- hoistbypetard 6y ago
  What was hard about self-hosting the official server? I found it a little resource heavy but their docker images make it all very simple to set up and run. I lived with that for a while, and didn't like the size of the VPS I had to use to keep it stable, so I moved to bitwarden_rs, and I haven't noticed any missing premium features. I like keepasxc also, but the thing that moved me from that to bitwarden was my desire to use my password databases in multiple places at once without conflicts. I think the bitwarden browser integration and phone integration is nicer, also.