How can you argue that it's dangerous when the scientific evidence is so overwhelmingly to the contrary? Your entire post contains many unsubstantiated beliefs

How can you argue that it's dangerous when the scientific evidence is so overwhelmingly to the contrary? Your entire post contains many unsubstantiated beliefs: - Nobody is arguing the death rate is 1% anymore, that number is far, far too high. Apparent IFRs have been constantly falling and even the CDC - quite incentivised to support panic given their actions so far - now say it's around the level of seasonal flu. - The idea that the virus would infect 100% of all humans alive isn't based on any actual real disease. No disease ever known has infected literally everyone on the planet. There is huge amounts of data showing the virus isn't dangerous. People aren't "trying to spread a narrative". They're pointing out the real data on things like excess deaths, or the huge number who show mild symptoms.