4 ms·

I'm not sure what you mean by "their MS based stack", but if it is not about the build tools (.net etc), but about them hosting on azure: Bitwarden can be selfh

by berkes 6y ago

I'm not sure what you mean by "their MS based stack", but if it is not about the build tools (.net etc), but about them hosting on azure: Bitwarden can be selfhosted just fine on Linux. https://github.com/bitwarden/server#linux--macos https://github.com/bitwarden/server#linux--macos

thayne 6y ago
Unless it's changed since I looked at it, it requires MS SQL Server, which does run on linux, but isn't FOSS, and is very expensive to license if you aren't already using it.
- greggyb 6y ago
  SQL Server has a no-cost edition, SQL Server Express. This addresses only the free as in beer side of your comment. Not suggesting this as an argument for you to adopt BW, but just as an FYI.
- Semaphor 6y ago
  > and is very expensive to license if you aren't already using it. Not FOSS, but the express edition is free as in beer and the limits should not matter at all for bitwarden (I think the main one is max 10 GB). I prefer KeepassXC + Keepass2Android + Nextcloud though ;)