2 ms·
Not interested in entertaining conspiracy theories. If your response to "wear a mask to protect others" is "how dare you infringe my rights" rather than "how s
by JoshTriplett 6y ago
Not interested in entertaining conspiracy theories.
If your response to "wear a mask to protect others" is "how dare you infringe my rights" rather than "how shall we work together to solve the problem", there's even less point in continuing this. Stay home.
Plenty of states have banned smoking in public places; it isn't about not harming yourself, it's about not harming others. I'm absolutely in favor of "you must wear a mask indoors / around people / in public", as well as the absolute right of others to kick you out of places for not wearing one, and to otherwise treat you like a walking biohazard.
Helmets aren't an operative analogy; those only protect yourself and have zero impact on others, so feel free to decide how much you value your skull.
- jakeogh 6y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15003606 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15003606 Typical escape. It's the class of crime between n>1 people. Why not address that CDC pdf? I respect property rights, without them we have no property. Walking biohazard? You really think that helps your argument? Can you attach a stat to that? What % of unmasked walkers? ----Why not use the masks forever?---- You avoided the first and primary question. Helmets; why not say if you are for socalized medicine? I dont need to make the connection for you. States banning smoking with law was a mistake, property rights and voting with our $ were more than sufficent. I wont go somewhere if I dont like the enviroment.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]