3 ms·
Very believable as a tactic to get around the practice of only hiring already-employed candidates, mentioned here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297
by Corvus 16y ago
Very believable as a tactic to get around the practice of only hiring already-employed candidates, mentioned here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203872404574257983795638374.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020387240457425...
- tzs 16y agoI think I'd rather go with claiming I just got off a contract for a defense contractor, and an NDA prevents me disclosing who it was or what I worked on, other than to say that it involved the same skills that are listed on my resume for my last non-secret employer. That seems safer.
- storborg 16y agoAnd totally believable... not.
- elai 16y agoDoesn't have to be a defense contractor. I've signed a contract that basically did not allow me to disclose what or who I was working for to create a software product for a small tv production company. (It fell through)
- jonah 16y agoSame here. I have done work for a number of large companies in software, healthcare, banking, etc. which I can't talk about. It leaves a grey hole in my portfolio.