3 ms·
> Which has worked well in lots of countries Has it really? Lots of people in LTC facilities have died, no?
by mirimir 6y ago
> Which has worked well in lots of countries
Has it really? Lots of people in LTC facilities have died, no?
- robbiep 6y agoI’m not talking about Sweden, or the US, or Italy or the UK or France, But NZ, Vietnam, China and Australia (current flare up not withstanding) have pursued policies of lockdowns, contract tracing and heavy testing. Your proposal is more convoluted and relies on the imperfect information we have regarding susceptibilities (genetic susceptibilities) being correct, and being able to scale tests to a couple billion people almost immediately so we can tell who should stay inside.
- mirimir 6y agoSure, but it's likely that this won't be going away. So as soon as you relax lockdown, it may well come back. Unless there's a vaccine, which I'm not betting on. And then there's the chance of another zoonotic virus in a few years. Time will tell, but it may turn out that isolating vulnerable populations is the best long-term strategy.
- robbiep 6y agoYou’re right that it’s a marathon not a race. But isolating the vulnerable (on a semi permenant Basis) is not easy or good for these people. With good testing infrastructure and contact tracing, we can minimise harm. We just have absolutely no definite idea who are those who are otherwise healthy who are going to end up hospitalised (say for my age group 30-40 males it currently looks like 1:500 will end up needing hospital support) and that’s even before you look at those who may do fine without hospital but still be carrying some serious consequences (ie original poster’s partner). I for one would like to avoid getting this altogether
- mirimir 6y agoMaybe more than marathon. I mean, the influenza strain that caused the 1918 pandemic is still circulating. Notwithstanding herd immunity through vaccination.