3 ms·
That's Benjamin Graham. (since there's another reply, the parent article points to the wrong Graham).
by not2b 6y ago
That's Benjamin Graham. (since there's another reply, the parent article points to the wrong Graham).
- iamaaditya 6y agoGraham's Number, as in 3 ↑↑ 3, is named after Ron Graham. [1] https://plus.maths.org/content/too-big-write-not-too-big-graham https://plus.maths.org/content/too-big-write-not-too-big-gra... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number?oldformat=true https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number?oldformat=tr... [3] And here is the man himself describing it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuigptwlVHo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuigptwlVHo
- gabrielsroka 6y ago3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 = g1, Graham's Number is g64. See the article for details. I'd write it out, but this margin is too narrow.
- agumonkey 6y agoI find it stupidly fascinating how notation compressed a quantity so large in so few.