of course faang is tech. Your assertion was not "faang is tech" it was "faang is all that tech consists of". These are not equivalent, and I recommend you view

of course faang is tech. Your assertion was not "faang is tech" it was "faang is all that tech consists of". These are not equivalent, and I recommend you view [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies EDIT: Just to hammer it home, view [2] and weep that money.usnews.com is on everyone else in this discussions side. [2] https://money.usnews.com/investing/stock-market-news/slideshows/best-tech-stocks-to-buy-this-year?slide=3 https://money.usnews.com/investing/stock-market-news/slidesh... To everyone else in this thread, sorry for feeding the trolls.