You might be disappointed. Larry Page has vocal cord paralysis on both sides, and as a result, his in-person presence is not very satisfying. Moreover, Page wo

You might be disappointed. Larry Page has vocal cord paralysis on both sides, and as a result, his in-person presence is not very satisfying. Moreover, Page would not have substantially more interesting testimony. For any Googler at the top, the answer to the question of "Why is Google so dominant?" is "Google's services are free and high-quality," and there's not really any extra thinking that goes into that line of thought. We shouldn't expect that Page, nor any other executive, would say something like "Yes, Doubleclick was operating fraudulently," or "Yes, we agreed with Apple to fix salaries and avoid poaching," or "Yes, we developed tools to help China commit human-rights abuses," or "Yes, we knew about Eric Schmidt's trip to see Julian Assange," or "Yes, we successfully avoided tax burdens in multiple jurisdictions." It's one thing to have strong circumstantial evidence and informally-recognized smoking guns, and another thing to expect a top executive to directly and nonchalantly incriminate themselves in front of Congress.