5 ms·
I worked for redhat in a past life and I recall having to do this for documentation back in 2003-2004 to comply with a California law[0] regarding vendors to th
by fooblat 6y ago
I worked for redhat in a past life and I recall having to do this for documentation back in 2003-2004 to comply with a California law[0] regarding vendors to the government.
It's been a long time but I'm pretty sure I remember changing "master/slave" to "primary/secondary" in a bunch of bind docs.
0. (this might be it) https://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.reut/ https://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.re...
- treebornfrog 6y agoI feel as though primary/secondary doesn't define the relationship properly. I, for one, think this is all getting ridiculous now.
- fooblat 6y agoThe chosen terms don't define the relationship. The documentation defines the terms in the given context, including their relationship.