3 ms·

I thought the same thing - but he does seem to have a pretty good argument backing up his terminology: http://www.michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=34

by dpcan 16y ago

I thought the same thing - but he does seem to have a pretty good argument backing up his terminology: http://www.michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=340#comment-171627566 http://www.michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=340#co... If the link doesn't work, it's down a ways in the comments.

cmsj 16y ago
The link didn't seem to work - did you mean the one where he talks about the trademark being invalid? It's an interesting suggestion, and if true then Google/Microsoft should have no problems in appealing the trademark and having it revoked :) Until then, the trademark is granted and apple are required to defend it if they wish to maintain it. Never let such simple facts get in the way of a good bit of grandstanding though ;)