There are many good papers that would not fulfill your requirements. I agree that ideally they would go through several revisions until every detail is fixed, b

There are many good papers that would not fulfill your requirements. I agree that ideally they would go through several revisions until every detail is fixed, but rejection levels would skyrocket. We would not have many great papers. I am not too familiar with the AI field, but I know that at least in my field the quality is very often too poor. We have to try to improve it. But if I rejected every paper I review because every detail to replicate it is not there, I would have rejected 99% of them. And some of the ones that eventually got accepted were very valid and very useful papers, and replication not so important after all.