3 ms·

Well it makes sense... If you done actually have to be in the country to take the courses, then your stay is optional. For students that cannot go back due to t

Well it makes sense... If you done actually have to be in the country to take the courses, then your stay is optional. For students that cannot go back due to travel restrictions or that have other obligations in the country, it would make sense to let them stay. Of course if they come from countries that do not possess the facilities necessary to access online content, that would put some students in quite a pickle. Maybe those could also be treated in a special manner, but I doubt that many would be affected. Maybe the article wasn't explicit enough, but I'm not quite seeing the problem with this decision. Maybe the manner of communication?

the_svd_doctor 6y ago
It's because there is no "case by case" decision or any nuance. There is no "treated in a special manner". If you can't follow your classes in person, you have to leave. If you don't, you probably won't be deported per so, but in the future, any benefits (like employment) can/will be denied.
humanistbot 6y ago
> For students that cannot go back due to travel restrictions or that have other obligations in the country, it would make sense to let them stay. These students will not be allowed to stay.