3 ms·
> it costs exactly the same whether there's one house or two houses or a 4-plex at that place. In your specific example: + More cars parked on the street + M
by vorpalhex 6y ago
> it costs exactly the same whether there's one house or two houses or a 4-plex at that place.
In your specific example:
+ More cars parked on the street
+ More existing pipes under the asphalt to avoid or repair if you damage
+ More traffic on the street so you have to work more condensed hours and limit the time the street can be closed
+ Typically more density means less open room for moving machinery/workers/equipment
Ripping out a street and running a new main is endlessly easier in the middle of a small town than it is in downtown NYC, from getting the equipment in place to doing it safely.
- jeffbee 6y agoYes, but given _any_ initial density it is _always_ more cost effective to run new service to a more-dense new development, than to a less-dense one.
- vorpalhex 6y agoAny service from a water main to a bus line has a capacity, and the cost for increasing capacity is not always a linear function.