4 ms·
Seems to not show the whole truth for multi-state cases. Ex: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/147530/alabama-v-north-carolina/ https://www.courtlistener.c
by dlgeek 6y ago
Seems to not show the whole truth for multi-state cases.
Ex: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/147530/alabama-v-north-carolina/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/147530/alabama-v-north... just shows as AL v. NC, but it's actually Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Virginia and an interstate commission vs North Carolina.
- lordgilman 6y agoI'm sort of at the mercy of the WUSTL database, they only give one state for respondent and petitioner. I caught a few more cases with regex, but in the case of this one where the name of the case has only two states I didn't catch it.
- CapitalistCartr 6y agoWhere it says et al, that means "and others". State Of Alabama, Et Al., Plaintiffs v. State Of North Carolina., 560 U.S. 330 (2010)