2 ms·
Thank you, I understand convenience for author / inconvenience for reader. I do not use Google Analytics but it looks like it is possible to disable Cookies [1
by sergeykish 6y ago
Thank you, I understand convenience for author / inconvenience for reader.
I do not use Google Analytics but it looks like it is possible to disable Cookies [1], anonymize IPs, disable data sharing with google [2]. Effectively making it almost third party server logs analytics (no consent required). Would remaining functionality be sufficient for you?
[1] https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/36105/can-usage-of-google-analytics-without-consent-be-considered-a-legitimate-inter https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/36105/can-usage-of-g...
[2] https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/35528/is-it-really-possible-to-use-google-analytics-without-consent-and-if-so-why-ex/35587#35587 https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/35528/is-it-really-p...
- nicbou 6y agoYes, that would be far more than I need. That's the problem, actually. I could track a fraction of that and be really happy. I tried Plausible today, but their event handling is completely insufficient for my needs. It's basically a key-based counter. The keys have to be created in advance, and can't be categorised. This means I couldn't track outbound clicks without first creating a new event for every known URL on my website. It just doesn't work. It's a shame, because I loved every other aspect of Plausible.