5 ms·
This “huge JPEG at low quality” technique has been widely known for years. But it is typically avoided by larger sites and CDNs, as it requires a lot more memor
by tatersolid 6y ago
This “huge JPEG at low quality” technique has been widely known for years. But it is typically avoided by larger sites and CDNs, as it requires a lot more memory and processing on the client.
Depending on the client or the number of images on the site the huge JPEG could be a crippling performance issue, or even a “site doesn’t work at all” issue.