4 ms·
Look, gun nuts can debate semantics until they're blue in the face. I'm drawing a line between UTILITY and MURDER. Vegetarians and Vegans may be absolutely ri
by deanCommie 6y ago
Look, gun nuts can debate semantics until they're blue in the face.
I'm drawing a line between UTILITY and MURDER.
Vegetarians and Vegans may be absolutely right that in an evolved elevated humanity we shall no longer harm any other living creatures, but in the grand scheme of things there are ways to hunt that are humane, sustainable, and efficient. And there are weapons/guns optimized for this utility.
On the other hand there are weapons out there optimally designed for indiscriminate slaughter of other humans at close range.
- CompanionCuuube 6y ago> debate semantics until they're blue in the face. > I'm drawing a line between UTILITY and MURDER. The irony is so thick here, especially when you're talking about a search engine.
- deanCommie 6y agoa search engine who's utility is abuse by fascist-adjacent paramilitary police organizations to round up immigrants, discriminate against minorities, and create a pipeline of non-violent drug offenders for the private prison system.
- kortilla 6y agoYawn. A gun is designed to shoot bullets. The vast majority of guns are bought and never murder. A small minority of them are used to murder animals and an even smaller minority are used to murder people. Handguns make up the majority of that latter group. I own a handgun to shoot bears and mountain lions that might try to put the moves on me when I’m deep in the Rockies. One of my friends hunts with an AR-15 body gun with no intention of ever using it on people (and it has no automatic mode). He has it because of the handy attachments. Whatever classification you think exists to draw the line does not in reality.