3 ms·
My point is everything they talk about is common to any type of enterprise software development. It’s not new. And then they slap on “microservices” at the end
by remote_phone 6y ago
My point is everything they talk about is common to any type of enterprise software development. It’s not new. And then they slap on “microservices” at the end so they can claim to have written something new.
If they want to write something new then talk about the realities of how microservice development is different than regular enterprise software development. Not regurgitating the same old concepts and pretending it’s eye opening and new.
- rumanator 6y ago> My point is everything they talk about is common to any type of enterprise software development. It’s not new. And then they slap on “microservices” at the end so they can claim to have written something new. Again, your rant makes no sense at all. The blog post talks about a specific distributed system architecture style whose services are designed following a specific architecture style. And here you are, angry at someone because... Because you believe the author has ulterior motivations? > If they want to write something new then talk about Sorry, but you have no authority to tell others what they should or should not write. The author of this post contributed something to the public that's interesting and has value. Meanwhile what have you done?
- ChicagoDave 6y agoIt’s inherent in this comment that you really don’t understand DDD and why adhering to its precepts is a critical improvement in designing microservices. Plenty of books to read, videos to watch. Learn/listen before you speak.
- vmurthy 6y agoUm, it may not be new to you but it is new and eye opening to me and there might be hundreds or thousands of people who haven't read about this. From a newbie's POV, I quite like how the author explains the concepts with the example of an e-commerce company. Sure there will be advanced concepts but the author makes no claims that he is addressing that audience :) .