3 ms·
Disclaimer: it's late and I don't feel like SciHubbing it so I haven't read past the abstract. My N=1 opinion is that being "highly gifted" may not cause socia
by sverona 6y ago
Disclaimer: it's late and I don't feel like SciHubbing it so I haven't read past the abstract.
My N=1 opinion is that being "highly gifted" may not cause social and emotional trauma, but it can certainly complicate unrelated trauma.
I skipped so many grades when I was a kid that they started holding me back so I wouldn't get too "out of sync" (I did junior high twice.) I got along socially with relatively little bullying. But I still have a lot of school-related trauma, especially concerning emotional regulation.
My working theory is that none of my teachers had any idea how to teach a 7-year-old in the midst of kids twice their age, so they treated me like I was twice my age, which was fine intellectually but messed me up emotionally. The emotional impact of this has absolutely nothing to do with my giftedness; it would mess any child up.
There are some postrationalists that tweet occasionally about how their educational experience messed them up similarly. Qiaochu/QC Yuan is my favorite.
Also, I'm trans and there are more of us with this story than you'd think.
- gwern 6y agoFulltext: https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/smpy/2020-bernstein.pdf https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/smpy/2020-bernstein.pdf I keep a fulltext bibliography of SMPY-related papers at https://www.gwern.net/SMPY https://www.gwern.net/SMPY - this is just one of many papers establishing that various kinds of enrichment and acceleration are just fine, do no emotional damage, and do save a lot of their life from formal schooling, which has been a major premise of SMPY since Stanley founded it in the 1960s.
- sverona 6y agoYeah, I'm agreed. My point, I suppose, is that the best "acceleration" available to me involved a good deal of emotional neglect and a pinch of actual abuse.