Why would a HN reader read a Psychology Today article? About half the articles in there look like they have to be wrong, and most of the remainder are unconvi

Why would a HN reader read a Psychology Today article? About half the articles in there look like they have to be wrong, and most of the remainder are unconvincing. The HN comments are not always faultless, but they are reliably redolent of authority. I'll always take the straight line path to the dopamine.