4 ms·
Clearly you did not read the article. In there it clearly states that it is because there is no electronic tracking system of any kind. They're trying to figur
by djhaskin987 6y ago
Clearly you did not read the article.
In there it clearly states that it is because there is no electronic tracking system of any kind. They're trying to figure out the estimates based on paper records.
- alphachloride 6y agoI would suggest that you take a look at the guidelines[1] for hacker news, which I believe set a good standard for productive discourse. Particularly: > Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that." [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html