Ah, I see. That said, the political interpretation of the science depends a lot on what questions you ask and what facts you pick. It would be pretty east to p

Ah, I see. That said, the political interpretation of the science depends a lot on what questions you ask and what facts you pick. It would be pretty east to portray science as being anti-gay or anti-trans just by asking different questions. E.g. you could ask about the proportion of exclusively homosexual animals or looks at homosexuality incidence rates in different environments. For trans you could do comparisons of prevalence of various personality traits that have differing frequencies by gender. Reality doesn't normally wholely favour a particular political party, there's normally some facts you can spin in for a particular party.